H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

David Wheaton vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-3

Andrei Cherkasov holds a 3–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Cherkasov leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1992 Moscow fourth round 6-4 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 13, 1992* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Andrei Cherkasov #30 6-4 7-6(2) David Wheaton #42 Match data
Aug 13, 1992* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Wheaton #44 6-2 7-6(2) Andrei Cherkasov #27 Match data
Aug 10, 1991* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #17 6-3 6-2 David Wheaton #12 Match data
Jan 10, 1991* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #21 6-2 6-0 David Wheaton #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3 — — — — — — —