H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Andres Gomez H2H: 3-0

David Wheaton holds a 3–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Wheaton leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1991 Cincinnati Open round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Wheaton #12 7-5 6-2 Andres Gomez #90 Match data Aug 8, 1991* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Wheaton #35 6-7 6-3 6-1 Andres Gomez #6 Match data Oct 25, 1990* R32 Stockholm Open Masters 1000 Carpet
David Wheaton #51 7-5 6-4 Andres Gomez #15 Match data Jan 11, 1990* R32 Sydney International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 — — — — — — — 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 — — — — — — — 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 66/69 of Andres Gomez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Andres Gomez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% 1991 37/39 5.7 2.9 56.6% 73.4% 50.8% 57.1% 46.8% 63.5% 39.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 22/22 5.8 3.9 54.4% 71.8% 47.2% 64.5% 40.1% 60.5% 38.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 7/8 5.4 3.7 58.5% 63.7% 44.0% 57.7% 45.5% 55.5% 40.7%
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 66/763 5.7 3.3 56.1% 71.8% 48.9% 59.6% 44.4% 61.6% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.