H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Wheaton vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-0

David Wheaton holds a 3–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Wheaton leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1995 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Wheaton #31 6-3 6-1 Cedric Pioline #55 Match data
Jan 15, 1993* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Hard David Wheaton #50 3-6 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #33 Match data
Jun 28, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass David Wheaton #20 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 Cedric Pioline #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5