H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Wheaton vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1995 Stockholm third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1995* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-4 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1995* | Newport | ATP 250 | F | Grass | David Prinosil | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1994* | Newport | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | David Wheaton | 7-6(4) 6-1 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |