H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 0-3

Jacco Eltingh holds a 3–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1994 Sydney Indoor round of 32 7-6(7) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Jacco Eltingh
NED Age 56 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jacco Eltingh #34 7-6(7) 7-6(5) David Wheaton #36 Match data Oct 6, 1994* R32 Sydney Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jacco Eltingh #62 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 David Wheaton #104 Match data May 27, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jacco Eltingh #97 6-4 6-4 David Wheaton #27 Match data Jun 19, 1992* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Jacco Eltingh #1,378 #19 1,332 1,876 124 141 46.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Jacco Eltingh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #276 1,490 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% #128 1,525 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1991 12–24 33.3% #114 1,510 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1992 18–22 45.0% #78 1,591 0 1
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1993 22–26 45.8% #63 1,634 0 2
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1994 40–23 63.5% #23 1,829 0 4
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1995 24–26 48.0% #43 1,772 0 4
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1996 4–12 25.0% #307 1,617 0 4
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1997 1–5 16.7% #604 1,557 0 4
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Jacco Eltingh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 4 12 16 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1993 10 13 23 43.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 37 59 96 38.5% 34 36 70 48.6% 26 19 45 57.8% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 221/259 of Jacco Eltingh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Jacco Eltingh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 33/36 7.1 3.6 60.0% 67.4% 46.4% 49.1% 34.5% 59.1% 31.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 37/40 6.7 2.6 62.9% 72.4% 50.1% 68.9% 36.1% 64.2% 34.0%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% 1993 43/48 6.0 3.5 63.0% 72.6% 48.7% 58.3% 35.2% 63.5% 33.4%
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% 1994 49/63 9.5 4.0 63.3% 76.3% 48.7% 61.2% 35.3% 66.1% 34.2%
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 1995 43/50 8.1 5.0 61.2% 74.7% 49.8% 61.9% 42.9% 65.0% 34.0%
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% 1996 11/16 6.4 4.3 56.0% 74.8% 47.9% 50.6% 38.3% 63.0% 32.2%
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% 1997 5/6 11.4 5.4 61.5% 74.9% 50.4% 56.3% 40.6% 65.6% 32.1%
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 221/265 7.6 3.8 61.9% 73.2% 48.8% 59.6% 37.0% 63.9% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Jacco Eltingh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 1989 1490 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1990 1525 104.0 — — — — +51 — — 61.5% +0.85 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.66
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) 99.0 -1.35 1991 1510 114.5 -1.53 -5.09 0.781 45.9% -36 +33 +133 35.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 7–5 (58%) 102.4 +1.30
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) 103.8 -1.34 1992 1591 132.8 +2.27 -3.70 0.949 49.5% -101 +22 +152 44.1% -0.41 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 105.3 -1.05
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) 105.6 -4.05 1993 1635 126.1 +1.74 -3.99 0.916 48.5% -80 +16 +85 44.6% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 10–7 (59%) 106.8 -0.27
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) 103.1 +0.32 1994 1829 139.4 +3.57 -2.91 1.009 50.3% -35 -81 -105 60.4% +0.25 11–9 (55%) 33–10 (77%) 113.1 +2.23
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) 101.7 -1.90 1995 1772 145.8 +3.15 -2.97 0.973 50.2% -44 -33 +79 50.7% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 14–10 (58%) 102.1 -1.27
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) 104.5 -1.67 1996 1618 118.1 +0.37 -3.11 0.871 47.9% +14 — +178 32.5% -1.05 1–4 (20%) 5–5 (50%) 94.7 -0.29
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) 92.1 +0.22 1997 1557 105.0 +1.00 -1.87 0.932 48.8% +19 — — 31.3% -0.50 0–2 1–5 (17%) — +0.30
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) 97.1 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 92.3 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 1876 135.5 +1.94 -3.58 0.927 49.0% -45 -14 +74 47.3% -0.28 37–40 (48%) 81–56 (59%) 108.3 +0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.