H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Wheaton vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 1-1
David Wheaton and Jan Siemerink are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on carpet, while David Wheaton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1995 Paris Masters third round 7-6(6) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1995* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jan Siemerink | 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-2 6-2 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Jan Siemerink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 |