H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Wheaton vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-1

David Wheaton holds a 2–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Wheaton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1993 Tel Aviv third round 6-2 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 1993* Tel Aviv ATP 250 R32 Hard David Wheaton #47 6-2 4-6 6-4 Jeff Tarango #63 Match data
Aug 7, 1992* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #57 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) David Wheaton #44 Match data
May 12, 1990* Kiawah Island ATP 250 QF Clay David Wheaton #48 6-2 6-7 7-6 Jeff Tarango #139 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2