H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 1-0

David Wheaton holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1990 Long Island round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Wheaton #44 6-3 3-6 6-1 Jimmy Arias #57 Match data Aug 23, 1990* R32 Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Jimmy Arias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Jimmy Arias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 63/72 of Jimmy Arias's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Jimmy Arias
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% 1991 39/42 1.8 2.8 69.8% 62.0% 49.5% 56.5% 42.3% 58.2% 41.0%
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% 1992 8/12 2.1 2.4 70.1% 61.2% 48.1% 53.6% 48.5% 57.0% 35.3%
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% 1993 9/9 1.4 3.6 69.5% 66.8% 47.3% 51.6% 38.0% 60.7% 38.2%
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% 1994 5/7 2.6 2.6 62.9% 65.2% 48.9% 58.4% 41.0% 58.4% 34.6%
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 1.0 3.5 59.3% 61.1% 46.7% 55.0% 50.0% 55.4% 32.1%
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 63/498 1.8 2.9 68.9% 62.8% 48.9% 55.6% 42.6% 58.3% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Jimmy Arias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.