David Wheaton
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 6 | 5 | 11 | Nov 3, 1994 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 3 | 6 | 9 | Jul 23, 1998 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 18, 1997 | H2H |
| Todd Martin | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 25, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 11, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
David Wheaton vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1
John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 1998 Newport round of 16 7-5 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Van Lottum | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data | Jul 10, 1998* | R16 | Newport | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,985 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| John Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,719 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,957 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | David Wheaton | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1990 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1997 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1998 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 23 | 1992 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1999 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1993 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2000 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2002 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 125 | 101 | 226 | 55.3% | 30 | 27 | 57 | 52.6% | 48 | 27 | 75 | 64.0% | 28 | 35 | 63 | 44.4% | — | 30 | 46 | 76 | 39.5% | 13 | 27 | 40 | 32.5% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | David Wheaton | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 1991 | 41/52 | 7.4 | 3.9 | 60.4% | 72.9% | 49.6% | 65.8% | 35.4% | 63.6% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 48/53 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 56.1% | 75.9% | 47.9% | 59.7% | 43.5% | 63.6% | 36.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 43/52 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 58.1% | 72.7% | 47.6% | 55.1% | 46.0% | 62.2% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 39/46 | 9.8 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 75.5% | 49.4% | 64.3% | 40.8% | 64.9% | 37.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 42/52 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 65.8% | 72.8% | 51.7% | 57.0% | 44.9% | 65.4% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 22/27 | 8.9 | 4.1 | 58.2% | 74.3% | 48.1% | 47.5% | 42.4% | 63.3% | 37.2% | 2003 | 24/24 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 55.8% | 69.8% | 48.0% | 59.5% | 55.2% | 60.3% | 36.2% |
| 28 | 1997 | 17/18 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 63.6% | 68.5% | 47.3% | 57.7% | 41.2% | 60.8% | 37.4% | 2004 | 16/16 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 58.5% | 68.9% | 49.0% | 60.1% | 34.7% | 60.5% | 32.1% |
| 29 | 1998 | 11/16 | 6.9 | 5.7 | 59.8% | 71.2% | 49.8% | 59.6% | 34.1% | 62.4% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 58.3% | 70.1% | 31.3% | 61.1% | 16.7% | 53.8% | 27.1% | 2006 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 51.3% | 64.1% | 54.1% | 66.7% | 25.0% | 59.2% | 30.6% |
| 31 | 2000 | 4/4 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 56.0% | 74.3% | 53.6% | 62.8% | 55.6% | 65.0% | 34.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | David Wheaton | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1525 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 47.1% | +0.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 1494 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1684 | 136.0 | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | -144 | 50.0% | +0.06 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–14 (30%) | 99.0 | -1.35 | 1996 | 1491 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.35 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1874 | 150.4 | — | — | — | — | -5 | -289 | -180 | 58.9% | +0.60 | 13–7 (65%) | 12–15 (44%) | 103.8 | -1.34 | 1997 | 1631 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | -56 | -46 | +18 | 64.5% | +0.77 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.2 | -0.05 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1957 | 156.3 | +2.86 | +1.19 | 1.052 | 50.9% | -13 | -360 | -71 | 60.0% | +0.56 | 8–7 (53%) | 15–9 (63%) | 105.6 | -4.05 | 1998 | 1612 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -50 | -79 | +129 | 40.7% | -0.59 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–7 (30%) | 101.6 | +0.05 |
| 23 | 1992 | 1806 | 145.3 | +1.33 | -0.69 | 1.009 | 50.2% | +44 | -202 | +66 | 53.1% | +0.22 | 13–6 (68%) | 13–12 (52%) | 103.1 | +0.32 | 1999 | 1662 | 128.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -181 | +3 | 49.1% | -0.33 | 6–6 (50%) | 13–3 (81%) | 107.6 | +1.68 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1730 | 145.2 | +0.85 | +0.44 | 1.001 | 50.1% | +8 | -96 | +174 | 51.4% | +0.23 | 11–10 (52%) | 11–8 (58%) | 101.7 | -1.90 | 2000 | 1517 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 18.5% | -2.33 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.38 |
| 25 | 1994 | 1783 | 150.7 | +2.86 | +0.69 | 1.065 | 51.0% | -7 | — | +170 | 56.4% | +0.39 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–10 (57%) | 104.5 | -1.67 | 2001 | 1584 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.87 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.48 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1705 | 138.8 | +3.53 | +0.28 | 1.099 | 51.9% | -14 | +18 | +177 | 55.1% | +0.37 | 5–9 (36%) | 11–11 (50%) | 92.1 | +0.22 | 2002 | 1624 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -68 | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.19 |
| 27 | 1996 | 1704 | 124.8 | +0.59 | -0.15 | 1.012 | 50.4% | -10 | -36 | +158 | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–5 (29%) | 8–3 (73%) | 97.1 | +0.53 | 2003 | 1599 | 123.9 | -1.54 | -1.36 | 0.912 | 48.4% | -3 | +14 | -27 | 46.7% | -0.27 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.1 | +0.37 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1706 | 125.0 | -1.29 | +0.95 | 0.954 | 49.2% | -17 | — | +152 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | 104.0 | +0.20 | 2004 | 1512 | 123.3 | -1.67 | -2.93 | 0.813 | 47.0% | +60 | +41 | +27 | 37.5% | -1.07 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.3 | -0.92 |
| 29 | 1998 | 1622 | 114.8 | +0.55 | -0.28 | 1.004 | 49.9% | +11 | — | +165 | 39.0% | -0.56 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.3 | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1584 | 95.4 | -2.29 | -2.68 | 0.587 | 41.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.26 | 2006 | 1511 | 103.1 | +0.34 | +3.36 | 0.751 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1563 | 101.9 | +1.95 | -0.92 | 0.979 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1986 | 148.6 | +1.78 | +0.28 | 1.027 | 50.5% | +2 | -132 | +57 | 53.2% | +0.25 | 81–70 (54%) | 98–93 (51%) | 101.8 | -2.18 | — | 1719 | 126.6 | -1.54 | -1.86 | 0.869 | 47.8% | +15 | -52 | +48 | 43.0% | -0.64 | 15–25 (38%) | 27–20 (57%) | 100.9 | +0.48 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
John Van Lottum
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 9, 2004 | — |
| Galo Blanco | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 8, 2004 | — |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 23, 2003 | — |
| Marc Rosset | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 11, 2003 | — |
| Arnaud Clement | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 19, 2000 | — |