H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0

David Wheaton holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1997 New Haven round of 64 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Wheaton #142 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 Leander Paes #105 Match data Aug 13, 1997* R64 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Leander Paes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 106/129 of Leander Paes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Leander Paes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9%
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4%
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6%
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1%
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4%
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9%
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1%
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3%
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6%
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6%
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Leander Paes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.13
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.81
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +1.30
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.