H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 1-3

Luiz Mattar holds a 3–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1993 Indianapolis round of 32 7-6(7) 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Luiz Mattar
BRA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Luiz Mattar #70 7-6(7) 2-6 6-2 David Wheaton #44 Match data Aug 19, 1993* R32 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Luiz Mattar #82 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 David Wheaton #23 Match data May 8, 1992* R16 Charlotte ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Luiz Mattar #51 6-2 6-3 David Wheaton #36 Match data May 16, 1990* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
David Wheaton #62 6-4 7-6 7-5 Luiz Mattar #59 Match data Aug 30, 1989* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Luiz Mattar #888 #29 796 1,766 176 163 51.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Luiz Mattar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1986 6–7 46.2% #95 1,567 0 0
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1987 24–17 58.5% #38 1,696 0 1
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1988 19–17 52.8% #44 1,678 0 2
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1989 23–15 60.5% #62 1,681 0 4
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1990 25–18 58.1% #43 1,696 0 5
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1991 17–24 41.5% #113 1,632 0 5
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 1992 21–17 55.3% #51 1,713 0 6
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 1993 19–22 46.3% #70 1,691 0 6
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 1994 20–18 52.6% #73 1,697 0 7
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 1995 2–8 20.0% #404 1,594 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Luiz Mattar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 16 5 21 76.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 8 8 16 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 7 1 8 87.5%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1990 8 5 13 61.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 12 13 25 48.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1993 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 83 69 152 54.6% 71 76 147 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 12 33 63.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Luiz Mattar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% 1991 36/41 5.0 2.1 58.4% 66.6% 49.4% 53.2% 43.5% 59.5% 37.0%
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% 1992 34/38 6.4 2.0 56.2% 71.6% 53.0% 64.9% 45.9% 63.5% 37.5%
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% 1993 35/41 5.8 2.5 55.1% 69.5% 50.3% 59.1% 40.1% 60.7% 35.3%
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% 1994 28/38 4.5 1.8 59.1% 67.2% 50.6% 55.4% 35.7% 60.5% 36.2%
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% 1995 10/10 2.9 1.3 61.4% 61.9% 57.0% 69.4% 53.6% 60.1% 28.4%
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 143/339 5.3 2.1 57.4% 68.3% 51.2% 59.0% 42.4% 61.0% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Luiz Mattar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1986 1567 121.0 — — — — -54 +30 — 50.0% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.15
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1987 1697 124.2 — — — — -13 -71 — 52.8% -0.01 12–5 (71%) 9–8 (53%) — +3.23
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1988 1679 135.5 — — — — -65 +52 — 52.9% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.58
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1989 1682 126.0 — — — — +17 -25 — 57.4% +0.47 6–7 (46%) 6–12 (33%) — +3.17
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 1990 1697 127.6 — — — — +63 -53 — 54.5% +0.21 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.59
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 1991 1633 123.3 -1.11 -1.85 0.913 48.4% +52 -31 -104 43.6% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.26
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 1992 1714 131.8 +1.84 -1.25 1.026 50.5% -3 -41 — 51.5% -0.02 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.94
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 1993 1691 135.1 -0.37 -1.77 0.899 48.5% +48 -70 — 47.1% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.03
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 1994 1698 127.3 -0.05 -2.01 0.916 48.3% +15 -47 — 49.4% -0.17 8–1 (89%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 1995 1594 111.7 -2.46 -4.96 0.713 45.6% +20 — — 22.7% -1.64 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.33
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 1766 133.5 -0.11 -1.94 0.921 48.7% +20 -30 -104 50.4% -0.07 62–47 (57%) 62–60 (51%) 104.7 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.