H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
David Wheaton vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 1-3
Luiz Mattar holds a 3–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1993 Indianapolis third round 7-6(7) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1993 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-2 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| May 8, 1992* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| May 16, 1990* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-2 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-4 7-6 7-5 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |