H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Wheaton vs Martin Jaite H2H: 0-2
Martin Jaite holds a 2–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1991 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-5 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1991* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martin Jaite | 7-5 5-7 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-2 7-5 | David Wheaton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Martin Jaite | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |