H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Mats Wilander H2H: 0-2

Mats Wilander holds a 2–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1991 Memphis round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mats Wilander #70 6-4 6-3 David Wheaton #40 Match data Feb 21, 1991* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Mats Wilander #5 7-6 2-6 6-3 David Wheaton #109 Match data Jun 15, 1989* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Mats Wilander
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — —
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 107/123 of Mats Wilander's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Mats Wilander
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% 1991 17/19 3.1 1.3 62.5% 65.8% 50.4% 54.4% 45.3% 59.1% 34.4%
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% 1993 9/10 3.1 2.6 61.1% 66.0% 43.5% 61.7% 36.3% 57.4% 35.6%
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% 1994 30/37 3.1 3.0 64.0% 65.9% 46.2% 55.9% 51.7% 58.7% 38.0%
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% 1995 35/39 3.1 2.1 68.9% 66.4% 45.9% 56.2% 48.2% 60.0% 40.0%
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% 1996 16/18 2.3 2.1 62.9% 66.9% 46.6% 58.3% 39.9% 59.4% 41.1%
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 107/729 3.0 2.3 65.0% 66.2% 46.6% 56.6% 46.5% 59.2% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Mats Wilander
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.23
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — -2.88
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) — -4.52
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) — -3.48
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) — -3.35
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.36
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) — -4.55
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) — -1.42
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -2.18
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.37
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.40
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.64
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.55
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.59
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.