H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Wheaton vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 2-1
David Wheaton holds a 2–1 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on carpet, while David Wheaton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1992 Australian Open second round 6-3 5-7 6-4 2-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-3 5-7 6-4 2-6 8-6 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1991* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Nicklas Kulti | 6-3 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1989* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | David Wheaton | 7-6 6-3 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |