H2H data updated: 2026-07-28 02:15 UTC
David Wheaton vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 0-1
Ramesh Krishnan holds a 1–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ramesh Krishnan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1989 Washington third round 4-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 65
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1989* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ramesh Krishnan | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | David Wheaton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,985 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Ramesh Krishnan | — | — | — | 1,892 | 278 | 249 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Ramesh Krishnan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,956 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 8 |