H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Wheaton vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 2-1
David Wheaton holds a 2–1 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Wheaton leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1995 Paris Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1995* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | David Wheaton | 6-2 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1995 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Renzo Furlan | 7-6(6) 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | David Wheaton | 7-6(6) 6-4 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |