H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Wheaton vs Todd Witsken H2H: 1-2
Todd Witsken holds a 2–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Witsken leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1992 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1992* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1988* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Todd Witsken | 6-4 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Todd Witsken | 7-5 5-7 6-3 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Todd Witsken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |