H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
David Wheaton vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 0-1
Tomas Carbonell holds a 1–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1990 Gstaad third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1990* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-2 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Wheaton | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |