H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Tommy Ho H2H: 1-0

David Wheaton holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1989 Orlando round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tommy Ho
USA Age 53 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Wheaton #66 6-4 6-2 Tommy Ho #667 Match data Oct 5, 1989* R32 Orlando ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Tommy Ho #1,306 #85 522 1,622 36 66 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Tommy Ho
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–4 20.0% #625 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–5 0.0% #641 1,444 0 0
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 1990 2–2 50.0% #182 1,490 0 0
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1991 2–4 33.3% #224 1,491 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #154 1,561 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1993 7–14 33.3% #132 1,553 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1994 2–10 16.7% #165 1,484 0 0
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1995 14–16 46.7% #127 1,562 0 0
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1996 1–2 33.3% #482 1,556 0 0
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1997 3–4 42.9% #250 1,560 0 0
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,546 0 0
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Tommy Ho
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 22 45 67 32.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 77/88 of Tommy Ho's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Tommy Ho
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/6 3.8 4.0 60.8% 67.1% 54.3% 60.6% 59.4% 61.7% 34.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 7/8 5.9 2.7 66.3% 72.4% 50.0% 54.5% 47.7% 64.8% 38.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 18/21 3.4 3.6 61.8% 67.6% 49.4% 56.5% 32.0% 60.3% 33.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 12/12 2.8 3.0 58.9% 64.4% 50.4% 47.3% 37.4% 58.7% 36.2%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% 1995 26/30 4.2 2.4 58.6% 71.7% 50.0% 51.9% 41.7% 62.6% 38.6%
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% 1996 3/3 6.0 0.3 63.6% 68.9% 61.0% 76.2% 37.0% 66.1% 33.1%
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 1997 6/7 5.7 2.5 56.5% 74.3% 52.5% 67.4% 68.7% 64.8% 35.7%
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.5% 52.8% 47.4% 50.0% 50.0% 50.9% 25.0%
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 77/102 4.1 2.8 60.3% 69.3% 50.7% 55.1% 42.3% 61.8% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Tommy Ho
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1493 111.5 — — — — +31 — — 16.7% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — -0.44
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1444 98.2 — — — — +20 — — 9.1% -2.27 0–1 — — +0.20
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 1990 1490 118.0 — — — — +32 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 1991 1492 106.7 -0.42 -1.22 0.898 47.8% +20 — — 40.0% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1992 1561 120.9 +0.64 +0.42 1.096 51.0% +23 — — 59.1% +0.41 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.42
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 1993 1553 117.7 -1.61 -2.42 0.843 46.9% +25 — — 40.7% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.53
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 1994 1484 112.9 -1.58 -0.49 0.877 47.5% +17 — — 25.0% -1.14 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.63
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1995 1562 130.5 +0.48 +1.09 1.031 50.3% +18 — +36 49.4% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.89
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1996 1557 112.9 -0.28 +0.97 0.978 49.8% +16 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1997 1561 115.7 +1.65 -1.05 1.015 50.2% +16 — — 47.4% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.34
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1998 1546 96.1 -1.39 -2.17 0.509 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 1622 127.2 -0.32 -0.37 0.946 48.8% +21 — +36 40.7% -0.54 9–23 (28%) 18–24 (43%) 91.9 +2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.