H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Davide Sanguinetti vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2001 Long Island third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2001* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | David Prinosil | 6-3 4-6 6-4 4-6 6-0 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Davide Sanguinetti | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |