H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Davide Sanguinetti vs Galo Blanco H2H: 1-2
Galo Blanco holds a 2–1 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Galo Blanco leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 1998 Palermo third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1998* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 6-3 6-2 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1998* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1997* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Davide Sanguinetti | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |