H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Davide Sanguinetti vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 1-1
Davide Sanguinetti and Guillaume Raoux are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on clay, while Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 1999 Miami Masters first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-2 6-2 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1998* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Guillaume Raoux | 6-2 7-6(5) | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Davide Sanguinetti | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |