H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Davide Sanguinetti vs Josh Tuckfield.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | Josh Tuckfield | Match data | Jan 17, 2000 | Q1 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,772 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Josh Tuckfield | #1,385 | #320 | 92 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Davide Sanguinetti | Josh Tuckfield | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Davide Sanguinetti | Josh Tuckfield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1994 | 1483 | 107.3 | -0.36 | +1.47 | 0.876 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 | 2000 | 1488 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1455 | 106.3 | -0.79 | -2.82 | 0.755 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 | 2001 | 1472 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1498 | 126.0 | -1.52 | +0.15 | 0.950 | 48.9% | — | +63 | — | 42.5% | -0.65 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.6 | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1676 | 129.3 | -1.67 | +1.12 | 0.996 | 49.8% | -85 | -33 | +42 | 51.4% | +0.12 | 7–10 (41%) | 8–11 (42%) | 97.8 | +3.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1560 | 123.1 | -3.03 | -1.02 | 0.856 | 47.3% | +21 | +5 | — | 36.1% | -0.95 | 2–10 (17%) | 6–9 (40%) | 91.9 | -0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1639 | 131.0 | -0.65 | +1.27 | 0.998 | 49.8% | +4 | -99 | +25 | 45.2% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 8–6 (57%) | 104.2 | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1530 | 122.7 | -2.53 | -2.07 | 0.871 | 47.6% | -6 | -17 | +99 | 34.0% | -0.91 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–14 (26%) | 92.6 | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1621 | 139.4 | -1.91 | +0.49 | 0.924 | 48.7% | +54 | -99 | -32 | 50.0% | -0.05 | 12–7 (63%) | 11–10 (52%) | 108.4 | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1621 | 125.3 | -1.40 | -0.39 | 0.915 | 48.5% | +60 | -134 | -67 | 42.2% | -0.40 | 5–3 (63%) | 7–11 (39%) | 99.9 | +0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1591 | 122.1 | -2.81 | -0.69 | 0.891 | 48.0% | +49 | -138 | -34 | 41.3% | -0.75 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–6 (45%) | 96.7 | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1710 | 134.9 | -0.38 | -0.85 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -28 | -90 | -81 | 48.5% | -0.04 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–12 (45%) | 105.5 | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1548 | 123.8 | -1.74 | -1.80 | 0.880 | 47.7% | +25 | +2 | +57 | 34.5% | -0.88 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–11 (39%) | 95.2 | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1520 | 110.9 | -3.01 | -0.31 | 0.835 | 46.7% | +46 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.4 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1510 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1493 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1773 | 132.7 | -1.71 | -0.37 | 0.924 | 48.5% | +16 | -39 | +4 | 43.2% | -0.42 | 63–75 (46%) | 72–95 (43%) | 97.4 | +1.27 | Career | 1500 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 27, 2007 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 17, 2006 | H2H |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 4 | 1 | 5 | Oct 15, 2005 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 2, 2005 | H2H |
| Thomas Johansson | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 4, 2001 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.