H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Davide Sanguinetti vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 3-0
Davide Sanguinetti holds a 3–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Davide Sanguinetti leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2003 San Jose semifinal 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2003* | San Jose | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2002* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-3 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2000* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-0 5-7 6-3 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Davide Sanguinetti | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |