H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Davide Sanguinetti vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 3-0

Davide Sanguinetti holds a 3–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Davide Sanguinetti leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2003 San Jose semifinal 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Davide Sanguinetti #69 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 Justin Gimelstob #98 Match data Feb 15, 2003* SF San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Davide Sanguinetti #61 6-3 6-4 Justin Gimelstob #160 Match data Feb 28, 2002* R32 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Davide Sanguinetti #101 6-0 5-7 6-3 Justin Gimelstob #90 Match data Sep 16, 2000* QF Tashkent ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,772 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Davide Sanguinetti Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,638 0 0 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,530 0 0 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,621 0 2 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,709 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Davide Sanguinetti Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1994 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 17 16 33 51.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 1999 2 5 7 28.6% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2002 15 10 25 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 100 178 43.8% 45 83 128 35.2% 20 27 47 42.6% 14 23 37 37.8% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 355/390 of Davide Sanguinetti's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Davide Sanguinetti Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 1994 2/2 5.0 4.0 40.8% 71.3% 40.4% 63.5% 27.5% 52.8% 41.3% 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 1995 3/3 5.3 1.7 59.9% 74.9% 43.9% 41.3% 5.6% 62.5% 28.3% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 1997 14/16 5.7 2.4 52.5% 68.6% 45.1% 59.9% 43.6% 57.4% 40.5% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 1998 45/56 5.8 2.8 54.2% 72.2% 46.6% 55.4% 42.9% 60.0% 39.8% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 1999 26/31 4.2 2.5 53.3% 66.6% 46.0% 55.1% 42.2% 56.9% 36.9% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2000 32/38 7.4 2.7 53.2% 73.9% 47.0% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 38.8% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2001 34/37 6.0 3.5 56.1% 69.8% 46.0% 53.6% 39.3% 59.2% 35.5% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2002 36/43 6.4 2.6 57.2% 68.2% 48.3% 53.9% 47.0% 59.7% 37.3% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2003 36/37 4.5 2.4 58.7% 69.4% 48.3% 59.5% 39.6% 60.5% 36.2% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2004 31/31 4.1 2.5 59.6% 66.5% 49.2% 52.1% 37.9% 59.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 50/50 5.4 1.6 57.2% 70.8% 49.8% 55.9% 39.5% 61.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 33/33 4.9 2.2 57.1% 68.7% 49.6% 54.9% 31.7% 60.6% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 13/13 5.3 2.2 59.4% 67.1% 44.4% 58.0% 39.6% 58.0% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 355/390 5.5 2.5 56.2% 69.7% 47.6% 55.6% 40.1% 59.9% 37.0% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Davide Sanguinetti Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.63
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.60
21 1994 1483 107.3 -0.36 +1.47 0.876 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.11 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.12
22 1995 1455 106.3 -0.79 -2.82 0.755 45.0% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.04 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.22
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.17
24 1997 1498 126.0 -1.52 +0.15 0.950 48.9% — +63 — 42.5% -0.65 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.38 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.32
25 1998 1676 129.3 -1.67 +1.12 0.996 49.8% -85 -33 +42 51.4% +0.12 7–10 (41%) 8–11 (42%) — +3.09 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 1999 1560 123.1 -3.03 -1.02 0.856 47.3% +21 +5 — 36.1% -0.95 2–10 (17%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.62 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.70
27 2000 1639 131.0 -0.65 +1.27 0.998 49.8% +4 -99 +25 45.2% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.27 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2001 1530 122.7 -2.53 -2.07 0.871 47.6% -6 -17 +99 34.0% -0.91 5–9 (36%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.78 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.05
29 2002 1621 139.4 -1.91 +0.49 0.924 48.7% +54 -99 -32 50.0% -0.05 12–7 (63%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.85 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.54
30 2003 1621 125.3 -1.40 -0.39 0.915 48.5% +60 -134 -67 42.2% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.67 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2004 1591 122.1 -2.81 -0.69 0.891 48.0% +49 -138 -34 41.3% -0.75 4–8 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1710 134.9 -0.38 -0.85 0.974 49.5% -28 -90 -81 48.5% -0.04 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1548 123.8 -1.74 -1.80 0.880 47.7% +25 +2 +57 34.5% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1520 110.9 -3.01 -0.31 0.835 46.7% +46 — — 42.9% -0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1510 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 1493 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1773 132.7 -1.71 -0.37 0.924 48.5% +16 -39 +4 43.2% -0.42 63–75 (46%) 72–95 (43%) 97.4 +1.27 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.