H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Davide Sanguinetti vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-0
Davide Sanguinetti holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 1998 Atlanta third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1998* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-3 6-2 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Davide Sanguinetti | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |