H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Davide Sanguinetti vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 1-0
Davide Sanguinetti holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Goldstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2005 Scottsdale fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2005* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Davide Sanguinetti | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Davide Sanguinetti | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |