H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Denis Istomin vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 1-1

Denis Istomin and Jeremy Chardy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2012 Cincinnati Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Istomin
UZB Age 40 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #38 6-4 6-3 Denis Istomin #33 Match data Aug 15, 2012* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Denis Istomin #103 6-2 6-2 6-0 Jeremy Chardy #34 Match data Jan 20, 2010* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,914 196 249 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denis Istomin Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,635 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2012 28–30 48.3% #43 1,751 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,811 0 0 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2014 27–24 52.9% #49 1,860 0 0 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,789 0 1 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2016 6–20 23.1% #121 1,707 0 1 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,723 0 2 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,678 0 2 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,575 0 2 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,552 0 2 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2021 0–3 0.0% #254 1,537 0 2 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
35 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denis Istomin Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2010 17 19 36 47.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2011 7 10 17 41.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 25 19 44 56.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2014 13 17 30 43.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 1 10 11 9.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 2018 5 8 13 38.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
32 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 119 148 267 44.6% 40 67 107 37.4% 37 33 70 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 437/445 of Denis Istomin's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Denis Istomin Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 2/2 7.5 2.0 61.5% 66.3% 47.4% 60.2% 22.2% 59.1% 27.3% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2008 4/4 4.5 2.0 62.2% 68.4% 49.7% 65.1% 38.0% 61.3% 35.4% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2009 29/30 6.6 2.7 66.1% 69.8% 48.8% 54.8% 41.5% 62.4% 34.1% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2010 58/58 6.7 1.5 65.3% 70.2% 53.9% 54.2% 41.5% 64.5% 36.2% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2011 31/31 5.5 2.2 64.3% 64.3% 49.6% 56.0% 36.7% 59.3% 34.6% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2012 54/58 7.1 1.7 63.9% 70.8% 52.2% 58.0% 39.1% 64.1% 35.8% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2013 59/59 6.3 2.0 63.2% 72.0% 51.6% 64.5% 39.1% 64.4% 35.1% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2014 50/51 7.0 1.6 67.9% 72.2% 50.5% 58.6% 39.9% 65.0% 34.8% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2015 43/43 5.7 1.3 63.5% 72.5% 51.8% 58.3% 38.9% 64.8% 36.5% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2016 25/26 6.8 2.1 63.5% 69.9% 49.2% 52.9% 44.8% 62.3% 33.7% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2017 33/33 8.4 1.7 65.4% 72.3% 50.1% 59.7% 44.3% 64.7% 34.2% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 2018 30/30 5.7 1.5 68.7% 71.0% 51.0% 56.5% 34.9% 64.5% 34.3% 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2019 14/14 5.5 2.0 65.7% 72.4% 49.2% 56.9% 39.4% 64.5% 30.6% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 64.0% 65.6% 27.8% 60.0% 0.0% 52.0% 28.3% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 2021 2/3 2.0 2.5 72.1% 64.6% 44.2% 50.8% — 59.2% 19.8% 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
35 2022 2/2 3.5 1.5 68.0% 69.9% 41.1% 72.2% 21.4% 60.5% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 437/445 6.5 1.8 65.1% 70.7% 51.0% 57.9% 39.5% 63.8% 34.9% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denis Istomin Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1474 112.2 +1.83 +2.43 0.669 43.4% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.22 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2007 1486 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2008 1559 115.8 -0.37 +0.78 0.914 48.9% +45 — — 50.0% -0.08 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.02 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2009 1636 125.3 -1.33 -1.62 0.907 48.6% +16 -133 -53 42.9% -0.57 5–2 (71%) 7–10 (41%) 102.6 +1.12 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2010 1768 143.4 +1.15 +0.13 1.018 50.4% -22 -228 -27 51.7% +0.19 13–12 (52%) 15–11 (58%) 105.7 -0.33 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2011 1666 130.3 -2.79 -1.92 0.850 47.1% +33 -165 +77 37.3% -0.88 1–5 (17%) 7–3 (70%) 99.8 -1.16 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2012 1751 150.1 +1.09 -0.48 0.999 50.0% -33 -229 +124 48.6% +0.04 10–10 (50%) 14–14 (50%) 102.6 -1.49 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2013 1812 153.1 +0.94 -0.48 0.987 49.9% +15 -243 -31 50.0% +0.05 10–10 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.9 -0.77 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2014 1860 158.1 +1.45 -0.54 0.996 50.0% +1 -139 -14 52.7% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 13–14 (48%) 100.1 -3.30 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2015 1790 143.8 +0.64 +0.10 1.036 50.5% -25 -86 +93 48.4% +0.09 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 95.5 -1.14 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2016 1707 140.8 -0.07 -2.12 0.894 48.4% -28 -26 +126 33.8% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 -2.01 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2017 1723 138.9 +1.33 -1.58 0.968 49.5% +6 -29 -40 45.2% -0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 105.9 -0.43 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2018 1679 132.6 +0.11 -1.51 0.968 49.0% -23 +18 +38 45.8% -0.11 4–6 (40%) 10–14 (42%) 97.3 -0.46 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 2019 1576 124.0 -0.42 -1.96 0.862 47.8% +79 +78 — 25.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 98.6 -0.40 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 2020 1552 113.0 -1.58 +7.36 0.589 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 2021 1538 107.3 -0.95 -2.93 0.484 41.2% — — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
35 2022 1571 110.4 -1.64 -0.13 0.846 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1914 147.1 +0.44 -0.79 0.963 49.4% -2 -119 +38 46.1% -0.19 63–74 (46%) 107–108 (50%) 101.5 -2.45 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.