H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Denis Istomin vs Ze Zhang H2H: 0-1
Ze Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ze Zhang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ze Zhang won the 2015 Beijing third round 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2015* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Ze Zhang | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ze Zhang | #1,385 | #148 | 374 | 1,586 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Denis Istomin | Ze Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |