H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1
Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Shapovalov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2016 Washington second round 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2016* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |