H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Dick Norman vs Martin Lee H2H: 0-1
Martin Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Dick Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martin Lee won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Left-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Martin Lee | 6-2 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Dick Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Norman | #882 | #85 | 456 | 1,629 | 27 | 66 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Lee | #1,474 | #94 | 429 | 1,594 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Norman | Martin Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #334 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #501 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #377 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #203 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #237 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #569 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #304 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #166 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #108 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #157 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |