H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Diego Perez vs Zeljko Franulovic H2H: 1-0
Diego Perez holds a 1–0 lead over Zeljko Franulovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Perez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1981 Florence fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1981* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-3 6-3 | Zeljko Franulovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Perez | Zeljko Franulovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 |