H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Diego Schwartzman vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 1-1

Diego Schwartzman and Carlos Berlocq are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay, while Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2017 US Open first round 6-2 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Schwartzman #33 6-2 6-1 6-3 Carlos Berlocq #95 Match data Aug 30, 2017* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Carlos Berlocq #74 6-3 6-3 Diego Schwartzman #64 Match data Feb 26, 2015* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Schwartzman Carlos Berlocq
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0
23 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0
24 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0
25 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0
26 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0
28 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0
29 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0
30 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1
31 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2
32 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Schwartzman Carlos Berlocq
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5% — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's and 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Schwartzman Carlos Berlocq
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2% 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8%
23 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5% 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5%
24 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0% 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5%
25 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4% 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5%
26 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4% 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3%
28 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6% 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6%
29 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4% 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1%
30 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9% 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3%
31 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6% 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8%
32 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5% 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8%
Career — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4% — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Schwartzman Carlos Berlocq
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.8 -0.75 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
23 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 104.8 -1.35 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77
24 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) 95.1 +0.94 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33
25 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) 99.8 +0.44 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25
26 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) 104.4 +2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) 108.6 -1.52 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01
28 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 100.0 +2.93 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59
29 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) 102.0 +2.52 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93
30 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -0.53 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20
31 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42
32 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25
Career — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02 — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.