H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 1-1
Diego Schwartzman and Carlos Berlocq are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay, while Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2017 US Open first round 6-2 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 6-2 6-1 6-3 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2015* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Berlocq | 6-3 6-3 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Carlos Berlocq | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |