H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Diego Schwartzman vs David Ferrer H2H: 2-0

Diego Schwartzman holds a 2–0 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2017 Antwerp quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Schwartzman #26 7-5 6-2 David Ferrer #31 Match data Oct 21, 2017* QF Antwerp ATP 250 Hard
Diego Schwartzman #42 6-2 6-3 David Ferrer #32 Match data Mar 25, 2017* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,263 703 371 65.5% 0 1 0 10 16 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Schwartzman David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,671 0 1
22 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,654 0 1
23 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,777 0 1
24 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,816 0 2
25 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,038 0 5
26 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3 2008 40–21 65.6% #12 1,837 0 7
27 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,871 0 7
28 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,035 0 9
29 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,109 0 11
30 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4 2012 70–15 82.4% #5 2,228 0 18
31 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,092 0 20
32 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,060 0 21
33 — — — — — — — 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,127 0 26
34 — — — — — — — 2016 34–23 59.6% #21 1,961 0 26
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,907 0 27
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,708 0 27
37 — — — — — — — 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,803 0 27

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Schwartzman David Ferrer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 6 10 16 37.5% 13 16 29 44.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 3 10 13 23.1% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 37 14 51 72.5% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 15 14 29 51.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — —
27 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 22 14 36 61.1% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 26 15 41 63.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 30 12 42 71.4% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 31 8 39 79.5% 28 5 33 84.8% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
31 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 29 15 44 65.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5% — — — — — 341 199 540 63.1% 311 137 448 69.4% 44 26 70 62.9% 7 9 16 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's and 1,056/1,074 of David Ferrer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Schwartzman David Ferrer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9% 2002 15/16 1.1 2.9 60.6% 66.6% 52.3% 44.8% 46.2% 60.7% 43.0%
21 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9% 2003 45/47 2.0 3.8 59.2% 63.2% 46.7% 53.8% 44.3% 56.4% 39.3%
22 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2% 2004 60/60 2.5 2.7 63.1% 64.2% 49.4% 56.1% 44.4% 58.3% 40.5%
23 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5% 2005 68/69 2.5 2.6 64.1% 65.3% 51.4% 54.6% 48.0% 60.5% 42.3%
24 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0% 2006 61/61 2.5 3.0 63.5% 66.0% 49.4% 52.9% 47.3% 59.9% 42.3%
25 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4% 2007 79/79 2.9 1.7 65.4% 69.1% 53.5% 57.6% 52.1% 63.7% 44.3%
26 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8% 2008 60/61 2.7 1.6 66.1% 69.0% 54.5% 55.7% 43.0% 64.2% 41.9%
27 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4% 2009 62/64 3.1 2.9 61.2% 70.2% 52.9% 58.9% 49.4% 63.4% 42.7%
28 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6% 2010 81/81 3.0 1.7 65.1% 70.7% 56.5% 63.9% 48.7% 65.7% 43.1%
29 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4% 2011 74/74 3.6 2.7 60.7% 72.9% 56.8% 65.7% 48.1% 66.6% 42.8%
30 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9% 2012 82/85 3.3 2.1 63.4% 73.9% 57.8% 65.2% 48.2% 68.0% 42.7%
31 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6% 2013 84/87 3.2 2.3 62.9% 70.4% 53.4% 57.1% 44.8% 64.2% 42.6%
32 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5% 2014 78/79 2.2 2.5 62.9% 69.9% 53.7% 61.3% 43.8% 63.8% 43.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 69/69 2.2 2.9 62.4% 70.5% 54.2% 60.3% 47.6% 64.4% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 54/57 2.8 3.2 61.3% 70.5% 53.7% 63.4% 43.6% 63.8% 40.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 45/46 2.6 4.6 59.1% 70.6% 50.9% 61.7% 39.6% 62.4% 39.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 25/25 2.0 3.8 60.7% 66.1% 49.2% 57.7% 36.2% 59.1% 39.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 14/14 1.6 2.8 64.7% 67.0% 55.6% 54.9% 39.1% 62.7% 41.7%
Career — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4% — 1,056/1,074 2.7 2.6 62.8% 69.2% 53.3% 59.2% 46.2% 63.2% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Schwartzman David Ferrer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04 2002 1611 129.0 -0.14 +2.61 1.094 51.9% — +85 — 59.5% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.80
21 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40 2003 1672 133.1 -4.21 +1.79 0.902 48.2% -135 +48 — 40.5% -0.84 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -2.35
22 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75 2004 1655 133.7 -3.20 +2.62 0.972 49.4% -121 +132 -112 46.3% -0.23 13–7 (65%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.43
23 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35 2005 1777 152.3 -0.65 +4.57 1.071 51.2% -27 +72 — 58.3% +0.68 11–12 (48%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.45
24 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94 2006 1816 148.0 -1.48 +4.87 1.055 51.0% -62 +114 -166 57.8% +0.52 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.00
25 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44 2007 2038 165.7 +0.90 +7.85 1.222 53.9% +1 -58 — 66.5% +1.31 12–4 (75%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.11
26 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19 2008 1838 152.2 +1.24 +4.88 1.168 52.6% -35 +228 -34 60.9% +0.75 10–6 (63%) 11–8 (58%) — +2.27
27 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52 2009 1871 159.3 +0.54 +5.75 1.169 52.8% +17 +139 -50 59.8% +0.90 14–10 (58%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.88
28 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93 2010 2036 167.1 +2.99 +6.37 1.257 54.2% -69 +114 -169 67.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–9 (55%) — +0.59
29 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52 2011 2109 173.9 +4.03 +6.13 1.283 54.5% +5 +84 -191 69.8% +1.52 12–7 (63%) 9–9 (50%) — +1.39
30 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53 2012 2229 173.7 +4.91 +6.11 1.332 55.1% -6 +114 -152 75.9% +1.67 14–1 (93%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.07
31 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19 2013 2093 174.2 +1.94 +6.08 1.191 53.3% +31 +273 -20 64.6% +1.16 20–8 (71%) 12–9 (57%) — +1.12
32 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10 2014 2060 172.8 +1.07 +6.87 1.198 53.5% +10 +218 — 65.5% +1.12 15–11 (58%) 17–12 (59%) — +2.77
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2127 174.9 +1.19 +7.08 1.223 53.6% +32 +170 — 67.6% +1.31 15–2 (88%) 12–10 (55%) — +3.35
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1961 160.9 -0.03 +3.83 1.112 51.7% +65 +185 -21 57.1% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.83
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1907 153.4 -0.46 +2.91 1.054 50.7% +10 +112 -23 49.2% +0.13 12–6 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.54
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 138.6 -2.32 +3.21 0.966 49.2% +118 +153 +130 41.7% -0.43 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.57
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1804 151.4 -0.33 +3.86 1.116 51.9% +47 +91 — 60.0% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.85
Career — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02 — 2264 167.8 +0.80 +5.33 1.149 52.6% -5 +126 -81 61.4% +0.85 194–111 (64%) 158–153 (51%) 102.5 +1.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.