H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-0
Diego Schwartzman holds a 1–0 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2019 Los Cabos fourth round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2019* | Los Cabos | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 7-5 6-0 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |