H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Diego Schwartzman vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 4-0

Diego Schwartzman holds a 4–0 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2019 Beijing third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 33 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2019* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Diego Schwartzman #16 6-4 3-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #38 Match data
Feb 28, 2018* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Hard Diego Schwartzman #18 6-2 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #27 Match data
Feb 25, 2018* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 F Clay Diego Schwartzman #23 6-2 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #40 Match data
May 19, 2016* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Diego Schwartzman #65 7-6(5) 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,047 238 211 53.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Schwartzman Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,588 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,720 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,780 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,963 0 1 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,001 0 3 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2021 34–19 64.2% #13 1,962 0 4 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,625 0 4 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,632 0 4 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7