H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Diego Schwartzman vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-0

Diego Schwartzman holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2019 Sydney International round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Schwartzman #19 6-2 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #101 Match data Jan 11, 2019* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Diego Schwartzman #58 6-2 4-6 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #36 Match data Jan 14, 2015* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Schwartzman Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Schwartzman Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5% — — — — — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Schwartzman Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9% 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9% 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2% 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6% 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5% 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
Career — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4% — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Schwartzman Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.8 -0.75 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 104.8 -1.35 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) 95.1 +0.94 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) 99.8 +0.44 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) 104.4 +2.19 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) 108.6 -1.52 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 100.0 +2.93 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) 102.0 +2.52 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -0.53 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.