H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Joao Sousa H2H: 0-1
Joao Sousa holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2017 Indian Wells Masters first round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2017* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |