H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Joao Souza H2H: 1-0
Diego Schwartzman holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Souza in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 6-3 6-2 | Joao Souza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Joao Souza | #1,306 | #69 | 687 | 1,669 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Joao Souza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #142 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |