H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 0-1
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2016 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-4 6-4 7-6(3) | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Juan Martin del Potro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 |