H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Kevin Anderson H2H: 2-2
Diego Schwartzman and Kevin Anderson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2021 US Open second round 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 1-6 2-6 7-5 7-6(0) 6-2 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| May 20, 2016* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(5) 7-5 5-7 6-4 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Kevin Anderson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 |