H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Diego Schwartzman vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 0-2

Leonardo Mayer holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Mayer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2019 Roland Garros second round 4-6 6-3 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Mayer #68 4-6 6-3 6-4 7-5 Diego Schwartzman #20 Match data May 30, 2019* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Leonardo Mayer #36 6-3 4-6 6-3 Diego Schwartzman #12 Match data Jul 28, 2018* QF Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Schwartzman Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0
23 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0
25 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0
26 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0
27 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1
28 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1
29 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1
30 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2
32 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Schwartzman Leonardo Mayer
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5% — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's and 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Schwartzman Leonardo Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9% 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8%
22 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2% 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7%
23 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5% 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4%
24 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0% 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3%
25 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4% 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1%
26 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8% 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2%
27 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4% 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4%
28 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6% 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1%
29 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4% 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9%
30 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9% 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1%
31 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6% 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5%
32 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5% 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5%
Career — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4% — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Schwartzman Leonardo Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83
23 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68
24 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
25 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
26 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11
27 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33
28 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37
29 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17
30 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32
31 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16
32 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
Career — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02 — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.