H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Diego Schwartzman vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 0-2

Lukas Rosol holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 St. Petersburg round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #85 6-4 6-4 Diego Schwartzman #63 Match data Sep 22, 2016* R32 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Rosol #43 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) Diego Schwartzman #100 Match data Jul 24, 2014* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Schwartzman Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Schwartzman Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Schwartzman Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Schwartzman Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.