H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0
Diego Schwartzman holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2016 Chengdu third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 6-4 7-5 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2013 | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Rajeev Ram | 6-4 6-4 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |