H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Diego Schwartzman vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-1
Diego Schwartzman and Yen-Hsun Lu are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on clay, while Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 6-2 6-2 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2016* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-4 6-0 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Diego Schwartzman | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |