H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Dimitri Poliakov vs Claudio Pistolesi H2H: 1-0
Dimitri Poliakov holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Pistolesi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dimitri Poliakov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dimitri Poliakov won the 1992 Australian Open first round 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dimitri Poliakov | 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimitri Poliakov | #757 | #93 | 410 | 1,651 | 29 | 45 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dimitri Poliakov | Claudio Pistolesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #103 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #214 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #164 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |