H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 3-1
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 3–1 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dmitry Tursunov leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Indianapolis quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2009* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-3 7-6(5) | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2007 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-4 7-5 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2007* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-5 6-1 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dmitry Tursunov | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |