H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2010 St. Petersburg third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2010* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dmitry Tursunov | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |