H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 3-0

Dominic Thiem holds a 3–0 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2018 Argentina Open final 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Aljaz Bedene
SLO Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #6 6-2 6-4 Aljaz Bedene #51 Match data Feb 18, 2018* F Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Dominic Thiem #5 7-5 6-4 Aljaz Bedene #49 Match data Jan 4, 2018* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Dominic Thiem #31 6-3 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 Aljaz Bedene #75 Match data May 26, 2015* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Aljaz Bedene #1,030 #43 1,169 1,893 131 160 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Aljaz Bedene
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 2011 1–1 50.0% #165 1,598 0 0
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2012 3–4 42.9% #86 1,627 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2013 11–18 37.9% #95 1,631 0 0
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2014 5–9 35.7% #145 1,671 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2015 17–17 50.0% #45 1,777 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2016 12–19 38.7% #101 1,740 0 0
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2017 19–18 51.4% #49 1,816 0 0
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2018 17–19 47.2% #67 1,733 0 0
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2019 18–18 50.0% #58 1,844 0 0
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2020 10–12 45.5% #58 1,798 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 15–15 50.0% #109 1,773 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 3–10 23.1% #347 1,660 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Aljaz Bedene
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 2012 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 6 10 16 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2018 2 7 9 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 8 11 19 42.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — 57 74 131 43.5% 61 64 125 48.8% 13 22 35 37.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Aljaz Bedene
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% 2011 2/2 9.0 2.5 60.2% 81.9% 49.2% 42.9% 33.3% 69.0% 28.3%
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2012 7/7 5.6 3.6 56.4% 71.7% 41.5% 62.9% 49.7% 57.7% 34.3%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2013 29/29 7.9 3.7 57.4% 72.6% 50.5% 49.4% 43.5% 62.9% 36.7%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2014 14/14 8.8 3.1 53.1% 71.5% 45.5% 45.9% 48.1% 59.5% 33.9%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2015 34/34 8.1 2.9 54.0% 76.1% 48.8% 58.9% 43.1% 63.5% 35.6%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2016 31/31 9.1 2.9 57.4% 73.7% 49.6% 55.2% 42.1% 63.3% 35.5%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2017 37/37 7.9 2.0 59.3% 73.4% 52.1% 55.4% 40.6% 64.8% 36.3%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2018 36/36 8.1 2.2 57.6% 72.3% 49.3% 59.6% 32.0% 62.3% 37.5%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2019 35/36 9.4 3.2 57.1% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 45.0% 63.9% 35.1%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2020 22/22 9.4 3.7 56.7% 77.7% 45.9% 56.2% 31.1% 64.3% 30.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 30/30 8.2 3.6 54.2% 75.6% 50.8% 54.9% 41.8% 64.1% 36.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 13/13 8.7 4.8 54.8% 72.7% 45.1% 58.4% 39.4% 60.0% 32.5%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 290/291 8.4 3.0 56.5% 74.1% 49.1% 55.9% 40.7% 63.2% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Aljaz Bedene
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38 2010 1510 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 2011 1598 111.4 -3.13 +1.53 0.912 49.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.14
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 2012 1628 112.4 -0.63 -2.09 0.811 46.5% +15 -14 — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 2013 1631 135.7 -0.57 -0.46 0.989 49.7% -24 +25 -80 43.4% -0.46 3–9 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 -0.37
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 2014 1671 125.5 -2.62 -1.76 0.838 46.8% +7 +10 — 29.4% -1.21 4–2 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.18
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 2015 1777 143.0 -0.50 -0.29 0.974 49.4% +5 -47 -158 45.2% -0.30 7–2 (78%) 9–5 (64%) 110.1 -0.03
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2016 1740 139.8 -0.05 -0.03 0.968 49.2% +1 -8 -110 41.0% -0.41 6–8 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.1 +0.06
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2017 1816 141.4 +0.23 +0.59 1.031 49.9% -96 -15 -84 50.6% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–9 (40%) 103.5 +0.31
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2018 1733 146.7 -0.98 +1.27 0.996 49.7% -89 +112 -31 46.8% -0.17 9–9 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 98.2 -1.19
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2019 1844 145.1 +0.02 -0.45 0.970 49.6% -71 -22 -134 51.6% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 11–10 (52%) 101.2 -0.41
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2020 1799 141.8 +0.66 -2.51 0.855 47.5% -20 +2 — 46.3% -0.15 4–1 (80%) 2–7 (22%) 98.8 -0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1774 129.1 +0.73 -0.73 1.019 50.0% -1 -14 -65 49.4% -0.03 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.8 -0.98
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1661 118.5 -2.51 -2.70 0.811 46.8% +31 +88 — 36.6% -0.76 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 93.6 +0.07
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1893 144.0 -0.36 -0.42 0.960 49.1% -29 +18 -94 45.4% -0.25 53–52 (50%) 66–68 (49%) 101.6 -1.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.