H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 3-2

Dominic Thiem holds a 3–2 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2022 Italian Open first round 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabio Fognini #56 6-4 7-6(5) Dominic Thiem #162 Match data May 10, 2022* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Dominic Thiem #5 6-4 7-5 Fabio Fognini #12 Match data May 10, 2019* R16 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Fabio Fognini #21 6-4 1-6 6-3 Dominic Thiem #8 Match data May 16, 2018* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Dominic Thiem #8 6-3 6-2 Fabio Fognini #25 Match data Aug 16, 2017* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Dominic Thiem #44 6-3 6-0 Fabio Fognini #29 Match data May 1, 2015* R16 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Fabio Fognini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — —
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — — — — — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Fabio Fognini
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6%
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3%
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3%
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2%
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 775/787 3.3 4.0 59.0% 67.3% 48.4% 53.5% 44.2% 59.5% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Fabio Fognini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.8 -0.26
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.0 +0.25
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) 98.2 +0.15
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 102.3 -0.90
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) 104.7 -0.82
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 100.6 +0.45
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) 109.7 +0.35
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) 105.6 -0.89
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) 107.7 +2.30
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) 106.5 +0.93
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) 97.1 +0.07
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) 109.2 -0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) 102.3 +2.85
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) 104.4 +0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.0 +0.27
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) 99.3 +1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.8 +0.20
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) 101.7 -0.21
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 +0.27
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.