H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 3-0

Dominic Thiem holds a 3–0 lead over Federico Delbonis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2022 Swiss Open Gstaad second round 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 32 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #274 7-6(6) 6-3 Federico Delbonis #125 Match data Jul 22, 2022* R16 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Dominic Thiem #7 4-6 6-3 7-5 Federico Delbonis #78 Match data May 9, 2018* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Dominic Thiem #24 6-3 6-4 Federico Delbonis #68 Match data Jul 31, 2015* R16 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,898 158 196 44.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,455 0 0
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,551 0 0
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,715 0 0
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,748 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,659 0 1
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,693 0 1
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2016 24–23 51.1% #41 1,752 0 2
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,810 0 2
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,722 0 2
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,715 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,671 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,598 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Federico Delbonis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — —
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2014 2 12 14 14.3% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 14 24 41.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 1 4 5 20.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 1 5 6 16.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — —
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 0 10 10 0.0% 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — 25 71 96 26.0% 133 113 246 54.1% 0 12 12 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 352/354 of Federico Delbonis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Federico Delbonis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% 2009 1/1 2.0 1.0 59.7% 62.5% 48.1% 28.6% 33.3% 56.7% 39.0%
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% 2010 2/2 5.5 4.0 51.0% 65.3% 51.2% 42.5% 100.0% 58.0% 30.6%
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% 2011 5/5 2.6 2.6 55.3% 72.4% 57.3% 71.3% 49.8% 65.7% 42.1%
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% 2012 15/15 2.6 2.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.7% 57.0% 45.9% 63.6% 38.8%
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2013 20/20 3.3 3.0 60.5% 71.8% 53.1% 65.2% 39.5% 64.6% 36.0%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2014 47/47 4.1 2.6 62.4% 71.1% 53.2% 58.2% 37.9% 64.5% 36.0%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2015 33/33 3.3 3.8 59.1% 68.0% 49.7% 53.1% 40.0% 60.5% 37.1%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2016 46/47 5.0 3.8 57.7% 72.7% 53.6% 54.7% 42.5% 64.7% 37.9%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2017 21/21 2.9 3.1 62.0% 69.3% 53.0% 58.4% 38.9% 63.1% 36.6%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2018 29/29 3.3 3.8 60.7% 68.1% 50.9% 59.1% 37.8% 61.4% 37.2%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2019 34/34 3.5 4.4 61.8% 67.3% 49.9% 55.2% 45.3% 60.6% 37.1%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2020 21/21 3.9 4.1 62.0% 69.7% 47.0% 59.5% 31.9% 60.8% 36.3%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2021 47/48 3.0 3.3 62.9% 67.9% 48.5% 58.5% 39.7% 60.8% 38.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 29/29 3.2 3.3 65.7% 65.9% 46.5% 52.3% 52.0% 59.2% 33.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 2.0 5.0 60.7% 63.1% 57.1% 66.7% 49.4% 61.2% 40.5%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 352/354 3.6 3.4 61.3% 69.3% 50.8% 57.1% 41.5% 62.2% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Federico Delbonis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 2009 1531 104.9 +1.54 +1.69 0.900 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 2010 1455 98.1 -1.64 -4.62 0.728 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.38 2011 1551 118.9 +1.25 +1.71 1.229 53.8% — +96 — 63.6% +1.55 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) — +0.34 2012 1716 134.1 +0.78 +0.82 1.066 51.0% — +108 — 42.4% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — 0.00
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) — -0.64 2013 1748 139.4 +1.43 -0.37 1.017 50.3% -261 +198 — 56.3% +0.02 3–1 (75%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.16
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.76 2014 1659 139.9 +0.59 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -187 +188 — 43.9% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.52
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) — +0.03 2015 1694 141.9 -2.55 +0.99 0.939 48.9% -227 +164 — 44.4% -0.62 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.35
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.32 2016 1752 151.4 +0.81 +1.24 1.074 51.0% -113 +125 — 50.8% +0.09 8–11 (42%) 14–13 (52%) — +0.29
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) — -2.09 2017 1810 146.8 -0.28 -0.65 0.992 49.8% -88 +44 — 48.9% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.11
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.26 2018 1722 141.7 -1.88 +0.36 0.963 49.3% -54 +64 — 39.7% -0.44 3–7 (30%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.63
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) — -2.20 2019 1687 143.1 -2.47 +0.35 0.941 48.8% -62 +160 — 42.7% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 6–15 (29%) — +0.44
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.03 2020 1706 134.9 -1.28 -1.40 0.926 48.8% -73 +115 — 45.3% -0.43 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.54
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.23 2021 1716 141.7 -1.58 +1.20 0.991 49.7% -195 +201 — 47.1% -0.02 10–5 (67%) 7–12 (37%) — +1.51
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1671 132.0 -3.23 -1.65 0.828 47.0% -137 +96 — 33.3% -1.01 2–5 (29%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.76
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1599 111.2 +1.18 -0.42 1.044 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 1–1 — -0.12
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1898 145.2 -0.88 +0.15 0.979 49.6% -142 +141 — 45.0% -0.25 51–62 (45%) 69–91 (43%) 92.9 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.